Library Catalog

>>
Library Catalog
>
000 cam i
001 2210080897461
003 OCoLC
005 20210225115028
006 m d
007 cr |||||||||||
008 200203s2020 njua ob 001 0 eng
010 a 2020002526
020 a0691204268qelectronic book
020 a9780691204260q(electronic bk.)
020 z9780691204277qhardcover
020 z9780691204284qpaperback
035 a2393550b(NT)
035 a(OCoLC)1138995963
037 a22573/ctvz1ct2jbJSTOR
040 aDLCbengerdacDLCdOCLCOdOCLCFdOCLCQdEBLCPdUKAHLdJSTORdYDXdNd221008
042 apcc
050 aQL737.P96bL349 2020
072 aSOCx0020102bisacsh
072 aSCIx0700502bisacsh
082 a599.88515/6223
100 aLanglitz, Nicolas,d1975-eauthor.
245 00 aChimpanzee culture wars :brethinking human nature alongside Japanese, European, and American cultural primatologists /cNicolas Langlitz.
260 aPrinceton, New Jersey :bPrinceton University Press,c[2020]
300 a1 online resource (xi, 407 pages) :billustrations
336 atextbtxt2rdacontent
337 acomputerbc2rdamedia
338 aonline resourcebcr2rdacarrier
504 aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 aCover -- Contents -- Preface -- Prologue -- Introduction -- 1. The Birth of Cultural Primatology from the Spirit of Japanese Uniqueness -- 2. Multiculturalism beyond the Human -- 3. Chimpanzee Ethnography -- 4. Controlling for Pongoland -- 5. Japanese Syntheses -- 6. Field Experiments with a Totem Animal -- 7. Salvage Primatology -- Conclusion -- Epilogue -- Notes -- References -- Index
520 a"Do apes share with humans the capacity to acquire qualities not inherent in their nature? Debates within the field of primatology over the last century keep coming back to this fundamental question, which compels us to reexamine our understanding of culture and of the nature-culture divide. This book is an ethnography that examines both the modern history of this controversy and its contemporary manifestations in both Japanese and Euro-American primatology. In so doing, it reveals the diversity of views on culture in the community of primatologists. The Kyoto School of primatology first proposed - in the 1950s - that nonhuman primates possess culture. Kyoto primatologists were ridiculed at the time by European and American sociocultural anthropologists and primatologists, who dismissed such views as anthropomorphic wish fulfilment. Decades later, starting in the 1980s, Japanese cultural primatology was given a second look as Euro-American primatologists began to debate amongst themselves the question of whether Homo sapiens is the only cultural animal. In the most recent chapter of this controversy, field researchers such as the Swiss primatologist Christophe Boesch have accused experimental psychologists such as Michael Tomasello of underestimating and even denying the capacity of chimpanzees for culture because they limit their studies to captive animals, brought up under cognitively debilitating conditions and tested in laboratory settings bound to favor human test subjects with whom the animals are compared. These controversies raise serious questions about what sort of laboratory culture is best for the study of primate cognition. Nicholas Langlitz's data comes from ethnographic research conducted in four locations: at Christophe Boesch's field sites in the Ivory Coast and Gabon; in Michael Tomasello's laboratory at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany; in Tetsuro Matsuzawa's laboratory of chimpanzee cognition at the Kyoto University Primate Research Institute in Japan; and at Matsuzawa's outdoor laboratory in Guinea. The book ends on a melancholic note. With the eradication of most higher primates in the next fifty to one hundred years all but certain (given the continuing loss of habitat due to continuing environmental degradation and expansion of surrounding human populations), these contentious issues surrounding chimpanzee cultural diversity are being hashed out just as this and related higher primate species are being wiped out"--cProvided by publisher.
588 aDescription based on online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on September 16, 2020).
590 aAdded to collection customer.56279.3
650 aChimpanzeesxResearch.
650 aChimpanzeesxBehavior.
650 aCognition in animals.
650 aChimpanzees as laboratory animals.
650 aChimpanzees as laboratory animals.2fast0(OCoLC)fst00857098
650 aChimpanzeesxBehavior.2fast0(OCoLC)fst00857090
650 aChimpanzeesxResearch.2fast0(OCoLC)fst00857096
650 aCognition in animals.2fast0(OCoLC)fst00866500
650 aSOCIAL SCIENCE / Anthropology / Cultural2bisacsh
655 aElectronic books.
776 iPrint version:aLanglitz, Nicolas, 1975-tChimpanzee culture warsdPrinceton : Princeton University Press, [2020]z9780691204277w(DLC) 2020002525
856 3EBSCOhostuhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2393550
938 aAskews and Holts Library ServicesbASKHnAH37229284
938 aProQuest Ebook CentralbEBLBnEBL6265225
938 aEBSCOhostbEBSCn2393550
994 a92bN
Chimpanzee culture wars :rethinking human nature alongside Japanese, European, and American cultural primatologists /Nicolas Langlitz
Material type
전자책
Title
Chimpanzee culture wars :rethinking human nature alongside Japanese, European, and American cultural primatologists /Nicolas Langlitz
Author's Name
Publication
Princeton, New Jersey : Princeton University Press [2020]
Physical Description
1 online resource (xi, 407 pages) : illustrations
Keyword
Includes bibliographical references and index. / "Do apes share with humans the capacity to acquire qualities not inherent in their nature? Debates within the field of primatology over the last century keep coming back to this fundamental question, which compels us to reexamine our understanding of culture and of the nature-culture divide. This book is an ethnography that examines both the modern history of this controversy and its contemporary manifestations in both Japanese and Euro-American primatology. In so doing, it reveals the diversity of views on culture in the community of primatologists. The Kyoto School of primatology first proposed - in the 1950s - that nonhuman primates possess culture. Kyoto primatologists were ridiculed at the time by European and American sociocultural anthropologists and primatologists, who dismissed such views as anthropomorphic wish fulfilment. Decades later, starting in the 1980s, Japanese cultural primatology was given a second look as Euro-American primatologists began to debate amongst themselves the question of whether Homo sapiens is the only cultural animal. In the most recent chapter of this controversy, field researchers such as the Swiss primatologist Christophe Boesch have accused experimental psychologists such as Michael Tomasello of underestimating and even denying the capacity of chimpanzees for culture because they limit their studies to captive animals, brought up under cognitively debilitating conditions and tested in laboratory settings bound to favor human test subjects with whom the animals are compared. These controversies raise serious questions about what sort of laboratory culture is best for the study of primate cognition. Nicholas Langlitz's data comes from ethnographic research conducted in four locations: at Christophe Boesch's field sites in the Ivory Coast and Gabon; in Michael Tomasello's laboratory at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany; in Tetsuro Matsuzawa's laboratory of chimpanzee cognition at the Kyoto University Primate Research Institute in Japan; and at Matsuzawa's outdoor laboratory in Guinea. The book ends on a melancholic note. With the eradication of most higher primates in the next fifty to one hundred years all but certain (given the continuing loss of habitat due to continuing environmental degradation and expansion of surrounding human populations), these contentious issues surrounding chimpanzee cultural diversity are being hashed out just as this and related higher primate species are being wiped out"
관련 URL

Holdings Information

RReservation
MMissing Book Request
CClosed Stack Request
IInter-Campus Loan
CPriority Cataloging
PPrint
Registration no. Call no. Location Mark Location Status Due for return Service
전자자료는 소장사항이 존재하지 않습니다

Book Overview

Full menu