Library Catalog

>>
Library Catalog
>
000 cam a
001 2210080710603
005 20110420111506
007 ta
008 110407s2010 enk b 001 0 eng
010 a 2010026356
015 aGBB0460732bnb
020 a9780521199339 (hbk.)
020 a0521199336 (hbk.)
020 a9780511776434 (e-book)
020 a0511776438 (e-book)
035 a(KERIS)REF000016153923
040 aDLCcDLCdYDXdUKMdYDXCPdBWKdCDXdLGGdUTOdBWXdUCDLLdCOOdDLCd221008
042 apcc
043 an-us---ae------aa-cc---
050 aK7340b.W36 2010
082 a343/.08222
100 aWang, Faye Fangfei.
245 00 aInternet jurisdiction and choice of law :blegal practices in the EU, US and China /cFaye Fangfei Wang.
246 aLegal practices in the European Union, United States and China
260 aCambridge ;aNew York :bCambridge University Press,c2010.
300 axiv, 261 p. ;c24 cm.
504 aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 241-250) and index.
505 aIntroduction -- Jurisdiction in electronic contracting -- EU rules applied in cyber jurisdiction -- US jurisdiction tests employed in e-contracting disputes -- Chinese legislation on jurisdiction -- Choice of law in electronic contracting -- EU internet choice of law regime -- US internet choice of law rules -- Chinese internet choice of law approaches -- Alternative dispute resolution and the internet -- The legal obstacles and solutions to online arbitration and online mediation -- Conclusion and recommendation.
520 a"The adoption of electronic commercial transactions has facilitated cross-border trade and business, but the complexity of determining the place of business and other connecting factors in cyberspace has challenged existing private international law. This comparison of the rules of internet jurisdiction and choice of law as well as online dispute resolution (ODR) covers both B2B and B2C contracts in the EU, USA and China. It highlights the achievement of the Rome I Regulation in the EU, evaluates the merits of the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreement at the international level and gives an insight into the current developments in CIDIP. The in-depth research allows for solutions to be proposed relating to the problems of the legal uncertainty of internet conflict of law and the validity and enforceability of ODR agreements and decisions"--cProvided by publisher.
520 a"Internet Jurisdiction and Choice of Law: Legal Practices in the EU, US and China takes a "solutions to obstacles" approach, examines the existing jurisdiction and choice of law rules and proposes the interpretation of those rules to the digital age. It discusses the need of the modernisation and harmonisation of private international law, compares current legislative frameworks in the EU, US, China, and suggests a series of ways to remove the obstacles of the determination of Internet jurisdiction and choice of law for cross-border electronic B2B and B2C contracts"--cProvided by publisher.
650 aConflict of lawsxElectronic commercezChina.
650 aConflict of lawsxElectronic commercezEuropean Union countries.
650 aConflict of lawsxElectronic commercezUnited States.
650 aOnline dispute resolutionzChina.
650 aOnline dispute resolutionzUnited States.
650 aOnline dispute resolutionzEuropean Union countries.
700 1 a王芳菲
950 0 bUSD110.00
Internet jurisdiction and choice of law :legal practices in the EU, US and China
Material type
단행본 서양서
Title
Internet jurisdiction and choice of law :legal practices in the EU, US and China
Author's Name
Publication
New York : Cambridge University Press 2010.
Physical Description
xiv, 261 p ; 24 cm.
Keyword
Includes bibliographical references (p. 241-250) and index. / "The adoption of electronic commercial transactions has facilitated cross-border trade and business, but the complexity of determining the place of business and other connecting factors in cyberspace has challenged existing private international law. This comparison of the rules of internet jurisdiction and choice of law as well as online dispute resolution (ODR) covers both B2B and B2C contracts in the EU, USA and China. It highlights the achievement of the Rome I Regulation in the EU, evaluates the merits of the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreement at the international level and gives an insight into the current developments in CIDIP. The in-depth research allows for solutions to be proposed relating to the problems of the legal uncertainty of internet conflict of law and the validity and enforceability of ODR agreements and decisions" / "Internet Jurisdiction and Choice of Law: Legal Practices in the EU, US and China takes a "solutions to obstacles" approach, examines the existing jurisdiction and choice of law rules and proposes the interpretation of those rules to the digital age. It discusses the need of the modernisation and harmonisation of private international law, compares current legislative frameworks in the EU, US, China, and suggests a series of ways to remove the obstacles of the determination of Internet jurisdiction and choice of law for cross-border electronic B2B and B2C contracts"

Holdings Information

Call no. : 343.08 W211I
RReservation
MMissing Book Request
CClosed Stack Request
IInter-Campus Loan
CPriority Cataloging
PPrint
Registration no. Call no. Location Mark Location Status Due for return Service
Registration no.
W0146305
Call no.
343.08 W211I
Location Mark
Location
법학도서분관2층_국외서
Status
대출가능
Due for return
Service
MMissing Book Request
IInter-Campus Loan
Registration no.
W0148121
Call no.
343.08 W211I =2
Location Mark
Location
법학도서분관2층_국외서
Status
대출가능
Due for return
Service
MMissing Book Request
IInter-Campus Loan

Book Overview

Full menu