Library Catalog

>>
Library Catalog
>
000 cam7a
001 2210080705363
005 20111013134915
007 ta
008 050215s2004 enka b 000 0 eng d
010 a 2005295422
015 aGBA5084612bnb
020 a019856841X
035 a(KERIS)REF000012559235
040 aSNMcSNMdAFQdUKMdDLCd221008
042 apcc
050 aU162b.A3 no. 370
082 a327.05221
100 aWalker, William,d1946-
245 00 aWeapons of mass destruction and international order /cWilliam Walker.
246 aWMD and international order
260 aOxford, U.K. ;aNew York :bOxford University Press,c2004.
300 a90 p. :bill. ;c24 cm.
490 aAdelphi paper ;v370
504 aIncludes bibliographical references ( p. [83]-90).
505 aConcepts of international order: the antidote to enmity -- Weapons of mass destruction and international order to 1990 -- Post-Cold War WMD order: two divergent paths -- The breakdown of WMD order -- The Iraq War and afterwards.
520 aHow should the 'problem of order' associated with weapons of mass destruction be understood and addressed today? Have the problem and its solution been misconceived and misrepresented, as manifested by the problematic aftermath of Iraq War? Has 9/11 rendered redundant past international ordering strategies, or are these still discarded at our own peril? These are the questions explored in this Adelphi Paper. It opens by focusing attention on the linked problems of enmity, power and legitimacy, which lie at the root of the contemporary problem of order. The paper shows how the 'WMD order' that was constructed during and after the Cold War was challenged from various directions in the late 1990s and early 2000s. It shows how the growing disorder was a cause and effect of a potent 'double enmity' that arose in the US against both 'rogue states' and the international constitutionalism that had been espoused by previous US governments and bound states to a common purpose. An ordering strategy that is imperious and places its main emphasis on counter-proliferation and the threat of preventive war cannot be successful.The recovery of order must entail the pursuit of internaitonal legitimacy as well as efficacy. It will require all states to accept restraint and to honour their mutual obligations.
541 cGift;a손주환 전 공보처 장관;d2010.11.10;e(W0123821).
590 a청구기호는 시리즈를 기준으로 부여하였음.
650 aWeapons of mass destruction.
650 aBiological weapons.
650 aChemical weapons.
650 aNuclear weapons.
650 aBalance of power.
650 aInternational relations.
650 aUnilateral acts (International law).
650 aUnilateral acts (Law).
650 aNational security.
650 aCold War.
710 aInternational Institute for Strategic Studies.
830 aAdelphi papers ;v370
950 a가격불명
950 c(기증도서)
Weapons of mass destruction and international order
Material type
단행본 서양서
Title
Weapons of mass destruction and international order
Author's Name
Publication
New York : Oxford University Press 2004.
Physical Description
90 p : ill. ; 24 cm.
Keyword
Includes bibliographical references ( p. [83]-90). / How should the 'problem of order' associated with weapons of mass destruction be understood and addressed today? Have the problem and its solution been misconceived and misrepresented, as manifested by the problematic aftermath of Iraq War? Has 9/11 rendered redundant past international ordering strategies, or are these still discarded at our own peril? These are the questions explored in this Adelphi Paper. It opens by focusing attention on the linked problems of enmity, power and legitimacy, which lie at the root of the contemporary problem of order. The paper shows how the 'WMD order' that was constructed during and after the Cold War was challenged from various directions in the late 1990s and early 2000s. It shows how the growing disorder was a cause and effect of a potent 'double enmity' that arose in the US against both 'rogue states' and the international constitutionalism that had been espoused by previous US governments and bound states to a common purpose. An ordering strategy that is imperious and places its main emphasis on counter-proliferation and the threat of preventive war cannot be successful.The recovery of order must entail the pursuit of internaitonal legitimacy as well as efficacy. It will require all states to accept restraint and to honour their mutual obligations.
ISBN

Holdings Information

Call no. : 327.05 A186I
RReservation
MMissing Book Request
CClosed Stack Request
IInter-Campus Loan
CPriority Cataloging
PPrint
Registration no. Call no. Location Mark Location Status Due for return Service
Registration no.
W0123821
Call no.
327.05 A186I v.370,
Location Mark
G
Location
부민보존서고
Status
대출가능
Due for return
Service
CClosed Stack Request
IInter-Campus Loan

Book Overview

Full menu