According to these two standards to examine the lessee's liability limitation, we can draw the following conclusions. First, the right of limitation of liability of bareboat charterers is the most undisputed. According to the standard based on ship ownership and the historical interpretation of international treaties, the bareboat charterer can claim the limitation of liability as the subject that can exercise the right of possession, utilization and profit of the ship. Second, the time charterer meets the ship management standards. A Time Charterer may operate and utilize the Chartered Vessel for income, while at the same time having direct control over the Vessel, so a Time Charterer is entitled to limitation of liability. Finally, the voyage charterer does not have the subject qualification of limitation of liability. Because the voyage charterer cannot control the ship. First, the nature of the TCT charter party is elusive, but the TCT charterer, like the voyage charterer, cannot control the ship and the navigation of the ship, so the TCT charterer is not eligible for limitation of liability. Second, the qualification of limitation of liability of slot charterers is controversial in theory and practice, but the comparison between slot charterers and voyage charterers shows that the limitation of liability of slot charterers cannot be exercised.