Identifying the real‐world challenges of dysplasia surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease: a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary health network.
- Resource Type
- Article
- Authors
- Elford, Alexander T.; Hirsch, Ryan; McKay, Owen M.; Browne, Mitchell; Moore, Gregory T.; Bell, Sally; Swan, Michael
- Source
- Internal Medicine Journal. Jan2024, Vol. 54 Issue 1, p96-103. 8p.
- Subject
- *PUBLIC health surveillance
*AUDITING
*INFLAMMATORY bowel diseases
*ACADEMIC medical centers
*COLONOSCOPY
*NEOPLASTIC cell transformation
*RETROSPECTIVE studies
*TERTIARY care
*MEDICAL care
*EARLY detection of cancer
*MEDICAL protocols
*GASTROINTESTINAL tumors
*HOSPITAL wards
*QUALITY assurance
*DESCRIPTIVE statistics
*MEDICAL practice
*LONGITUDINAL method
*MEDICAL specialties & specialists
- Language
- ISSN
- 1444-0903
Background: Dysplasia surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is often suboptimal and deviates from guidelines. Aims: To assess dysplasia surveillance behaviours and adherence to guidelines amongst a large tertiary teaching health network with a specialised IBD unit to identify areas where dysplasia surveillance could be improved. Methods: A retrospective audit of IBD surveillance colonoscopy practice over an 18‐month period was performed using the Provation Endoscopy Database and the hospital's primary sclerosing cholangitis database. Results: The audit identified 115 dysplasia surveillance colonoscopies. A total of 37% of index dysplasia colonoscopies were outside recommended guidelines. A total of 10% had inadequate bowel preparation and only 40% had excellent bowel preparation. A total of 28% of patients underwent dye‐based chromoendoscopy and 69% underwent high‐definition white‐light endoscopy. Dye chromoendoscopy was more likely to be used by IBD specialists than interventional endoscopists (P = 0.008) and other endoscopists (P = 0.004). Only IBD specialists and interventional endoscopists used dye chromoendoscopy. Dysplasia or colorectal cancer was detected in 3.4% of the colonoscopies. Overall, the several dysplasia examinations were lower than expected. Conclusions: Dysplasia surveillance in the IBD population remains an area of improvement given the current national guidelines. IBD specialists are more likely to perform dye chromoendoscopy than other endoscopists/gastroenterologists. Dysplasia rates in this real‐world contemporary setting are less than expected in historical studies and may represent improvements in IBD management principles and medications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]