Objective: The main objective of this research is to find out the community"s opinion on the development of Village Credit Institutions and the transparency of their governance after monitoring through participatory ergonomic approaches assisted by social media. Background: Participatory ergonomics is used as an approach, because it has involved the subject since planning. Method: This quasi-experimental study used a treatment by subject design and involved 32 subjects who were randomly selected. The dissemination of the results of the study was carried out through three periods. Through the three periods of uploading the analysis, public comments are recorded regarding the data, facts, and solutions offered. The data obtained were analyzed descriptively to determine the percentage of pro and contra public opinion. Hypothesis testing was carried out by using the Friedman test and further testing with the Wilcoxon test at the 5% significance level (α = 0.05). Results: (1) the presence of tracer of LPD increased significantly 51.02% between Period I and Period III, (2) transparency of governance shows an increase of 60.96% between Period I and III, and (3) LPD monitoring is considered the most appropriate to be carried out through program analysis and profit, as well as achievement and prestige. Conclusion: the most appropriate monitoring strategy is through program analysis, profit, achievement, and prestige based on data, facts, and solutions offered so that governance transparency can be further improved. Application: The results can be applied to LPD monitoring mechanisms.