I compared with the Korean Language Curriculum of 2011 and the Communication Art Curriculum of the state of Missouri in the Unite States of America of 2008. These two curriculums have the same aims and goals to develop linguistic competence of each native language. And two curriculums support students with literary experiences such as reading and understanding literatures. I analysed literary experiences that elementary students will get from these two curriculums. The following is the result of my analysis to compare with two curriculums. First, the Korean Language Curriculum takes its own plan to educate literature to students unlike Communication Art Curriculum of Missouri State. The Communication Art Curriculum just has some plans to read literatures to students. Second, the Korean Language Curriculum show more literary genres that students will learn than the Communication Art Curriculum does. The Communication Art Curriculum shows 3 genres, ``Fiction, poetry and Drama`` in the statement of the expectation. Third, the Korean Language Curriculum doesn`t have abundant detail contents that students will experience to learn literature compared to the Communication Art Curriculum. The Communication Art Curriculum has more literary contents and more detail contents than the Korean Language Curriculum. Fourth the contents of the Korean Language Curriculum are separated into classified contents and its grade contents, However, the Communication Art Curriculum has a contents table on a single sheet with classified contents and its grade contents. We should develop a better curriculum to provide better educational experiences because it is an educational imperative that we are elementary school students on the curriculum. And then elementary school students will get better experience for enhancing their literary competence.