This dissertation aims to address a dogmatic theological study on the significance of grace and freedom and the anthropological perspective. It is divided into 3 chapters in total in order to expound the topic. In the first chapter, it deals with how the inquiries on grace and freedom have been considered in history. And, the second part covers theological understanding on grace and freedom. Lastly, the third section presents the meaning of grace and freedom in a more practical and feasible way. In the first section, I have taken a closer look at the significance of grace in the bible. The Old Testament shows grace with two meanings. One is portrayed as impermanence towards the people of God. The other is illustrated as a sort of the testament based on credibility. The New Testament expresses grace related to Jesus Christ and the God who wants to make a new commitment. In other words, it represents the grace related to Jesus Christ. In addition, the New Testament describes the graceful achievements of God, who attempts to forgive the sin of man and reconcile with them, as grace or Jesus Christ in himself in the center of the achievements as grace. Based on this biblical understanding, I have also thrown light on how the issues of grace and freedom have been dealt with in history from two different points of view. One is about which one between the grace of God and human freedom is more prioritized to be explained. The other is about a perspective that puts more importance on human freedom. However, neither of the views should be considered right or wrong. During the times when a lack of understanding of human being was prevalent, the meaning of freedom could have been misunderstood or, in contrast, fallen into error by underestimating the significance of grace. For a long time, these two perspectives have sparked disputes while causing tension in history. Therefore, in order to relieve tension and look into the matters on new horizons, I have carefully examined the latest theological views aiming to elucidate the concepts of grace and freedom are not opposed to each other. The second chapter covers a research on how the horizons of understanding was enlarged in the history of Catholic dogmatic theology by looking into the lessons from the past councils that dealt with the issues of grace and freedom. In fact, the understandings of grace and freedom were newly interpreted depending on each different time periods. Particularly, the Second Vatican Council opened a new horizon on the understanding of grace and freedom with the development in science, physics and humanities based on human oriented thoughts and the problems caused by the doctrines of individualism and liberalism. The Second Vatican Council reconfirmed the traditional lessons of magisterial from the early council to the Trient Council about multiple dogmatic theological teachings, which Catholic church had been indoctrinating, as well as tried to reinterpret the church’s traditional lessons in the point of view of modern “aggiornamento” in order to define the identity of the church that exists in the world. Furthermore, in addition to the side of the one-on-one relationship between the freedom of individuals and God, it enables a new discussion on the doctrine of grace by gaining broader understandings from the entire perspective of God and human to the level of the community of God and church. On such horizon, contemporary theologians have tried to deal with the relationship between grace and freedom in various outlooks. In this sector, the modern metaphysics outlook, the historical outlook, the existential and transcendental outlook, the dialectical outlook and anthropological outlook are introduced. In particular, there are some reasons to support the anthropological prospects. First of all, a revelation points to man. Secondly, man is supposed to be a recipient of a revelation about themselves. Third, in order for a revelation to become understandable for human, at least it has to endeavor to communicate with the learning of the man living in the same era. Finally, in order for the dogma on grace and freedom, illustrated in a transcendent and conceptual term, to meet the life of man who is dwelling in this world, it should be expressed and put into practice in a humanitarian way. Based on such anthropological prospect, the inquiries on freedom can be brought up. So far, we have looked into the last part of the chapter two to get to know if the situations which people living today are facing are at liberty, or, what keeps them from being free and, most of all, what it means to be free for man. The context above is written in the chapter three. First, we have learned where man stands in Christianity. The genuine meaning of man is represented through Christ, as God and man. Most importantly, it has started from the point that a one who was God became a man by himself for man’s sake. As an authentic God as well as human, Christ saved man and let them become his children. Through his resurrection and ascension, he showed a better understanding of what man to expect. Moreover, he commended to free man and encourage them to consecrate. Following the request of Jesus Christ, man, liberated within grace through Christ, has responsibilities and roles to serve those who are oppressed and isolated. Their responsibilities and roles have to be extended in the level of individuals, churches and even the world. First of all, each individual has to take responsibilities and roles which are appropriate for their identities. As a layman, a religious and a priest, each one carries out their roles and responsibilities given in the places where they were called. Next, all of the people who were called to the church community have to proclaim and practice the gospel in the level of the church community. Also, they have to make an effort to enable churches to be the symbol of grace and freedom in the world. After all, all Christians have roles and responsibilities to be in solidarity with non-Christians to improve the unrighteous system and environment of the world. This represents the status of the man transformed with grace while reaching out to neighbors and overcoming themselves within grace and freely responding to God’s original intention on saving all people.