Truncated Type-I and Type-II HARQ schemes are compared, in terms of throughput, when incremental decode and forward relaying is used. The comparison is based on the outage analysis of both schemes. Two different scenarios are considered: ad-hoc relaying, where all users are at ground level, and infra-structured relaying, where the relay and the destination antennas are at a higher height than the user. Moreover, we also consider the effect of rate adaptation. Results show that Type-II (incremental redundancy) only significantly outperforms Type-I schemes (selection and Chase combining) in the case of ad-hoc relaying without rate adaptation, and in the low SNR region.