Since Ellen Moers coined the concept of the female Gothic in 1974, numerous studies have been dedicated to exploring the subcategory of the genre, expanding and propagating the notion that, beginning with Ann Radcliffe's romances in the 1790s, a distinctive female-focused branch of the Gothic dominates the genre from the eighteenth century to the present day. The implicit partner to this notion is the male Gothic, but this subcategory is lacking the same rigorous research. This thesis redresses the balance by conducting an analysis of first-wave Gothic novels from the 1790s through to the mid-nineteenth century, developing what has thus far been cursorily deemed characteristic of the male Gothic. Matthew Lewis's The Monk (1796) is considered to have been the founding text of the male Gothic. Violent, voyeuristic, and visceral in nature, Lewis flaunts the supernatural and sexual taboos that Radcliffe and her ilk only implied, parodying generic conventions and satirising social institutions. By engaging in extended comparative literary analyses, I argue that Gothic novels engaged in a dialogic exchange with Lewis's founding text, capitalising on the notoriety of The Monk to meet a rising market demand that was shifting from an interest in the Radcliffean 'Terror' Romance to the Lewisite 'Horror' novel. I analyse the crossovers between horror and humour in male Gothic literature from the late-eighteenth century to the mid-nineteenth century, focusing on pulp and popular texts as well as selected canonical texts to assert the importance of understanding the dialogic exchange between narratives of horror and the rise of culture for the masses. I draw on theories of parody and the grotesque to address the relationship between horror, gender, and sexuality, and the points at which they intersect to satirise societal norms.