We provide a method to determine whether a new recommendation system improves the revenue per visit (RPV) compared to the status quo. We achieve our goal by splitting RP V into conversion rate and average order value (AOV). We use the two-part test suggested by Lachenbruch to determine if the data generating process in the new system is different. In cases that this test does not give us a definitive answer about the change in RPV, we propose two alternative tests to determine if RPV has changed. Both of these tests rely on the assumption that non-zero purchase values follow a log-normal distribution. We empirically validate this assumption using data collected at different points in time from Staples.com. On average, our method needs a smaller sample size than other methods. Furthermore, it does not require any subjective outlier removal. Finally, it characterizes the uncertainty around RPV by providing a confidence interval.