Stroma-richness is commonly associated with decreased survival times as well as advanced tumor stages in various malignant tumors. A previous study on laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas showed very good agreement for tumor-stroma ratio assessment between pre-treatment biopsies and resection specimens. We therefore aimed to determine whether similar results could be shown for oral squamous cell carcinomas. 107 preoperative biopsies and matched surgical specimens were obtained from the histological archive, dating from 2011-2022. Tumor-stroma ratio was determined on all samples and cases were divided into stroma-rich (≥50% stroma) and stroma-poor (<50% stroma). Results were then correlated with recurrence-free and overall survival. Tumor-stroma ratio showed substantial agreement between preoperative biopsies and surgical specimens with a kappa correlation coefficient of 0.643. Concerning preoperative biopsies, 28 cases were stroma-rich (26.2%), in the group of tumor resections, 32 cases were stroma-rich (29.9%). No association with either recurrence-free or overall survival could be shown for both groups (p-values 0.158-0.495). Concordance between pre-treatment biopsies and resections was substantial in our study, however, as no association with survival times could be demonstrated, the prognostic significance in our cohort remains unclear. This might be attributable to the fact that almost 75% of our patients presented with early-stage tumors, which sometimes seem to show a less pronounced prognostic effect of the tumor-stroma ratio.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome. We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. We further confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of us. We confirm that we have given due consideration to the protection of intellectual property associated with this work and that there are no impediments to publication, including the timing of publication, with respect to intellectual property. In so doing we confirm that we have followed the regulations of our institutions concerning intellectual property. We understand that the Corresponding Author is the sole contact for the Editorial process (including Editorial Manager and direct communications with the office). She is responsible for communicating with the other authors about progress, submissions of revisions and final approval of proofs. We confirm that we have provided a current, correct email address which is accessible by the Corresponding Author.
(Copyright © 2024 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.)