Mineral dust particles play an important role in the climate system, by e.g. interacting with solar and terrestrial radiation or facilitating the formation of cloud droplets. Additionally, dust particles can act as very efficient ice nuclei in cirrus clouds. Many Global Chemistry Climate Models (GCCMs) use prescribed monthly mean mineral dust emissions representative of a specific year, based on a climatology. It was hypothesized that using dust emission climatologies may lead to misrepresentations of strong dust burst episodes, resulting in a negative bias of model dust concentrations compared to observations for these episodes. Here, we apply the aerosol microphysics submodel MADE3 (Modal Aerosol Dynamics model for Europe, adapted for global applications, third generation) as part of the ECHAM/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry (EMAC) general circulation model. We employ two different representations of mineral dust for our model simulations: i) a prescribed monthly-mean climatology of dust emissions representative of the year 2000; ii) an online dust parametrization which calculates wind-driven mineral dust emissions at every model time-step. We evaluate model results for these two dust representations by comparison with observations of aerosol optical depth from ground-based station data. The model results show a better agreement with the observations for strong dust burst events when using the online dust representation compared to the prescribed dust emissions setup. Furthermore, we analyse the effect of increasing the vertical and horizontal model resolution on mineral dust properties in our model. The model is evaluated against airborne in situ measurements performed during the SALTRACE mineral dust campaign (Saharan Aerosol Long-range Transport and Aerosol-Cloud Interaction Experiment, June/July 2013), i.e. observations of dust transported from the Sahara to the Caribbean. Results show that an increased horizontal and vertical model resolution is able to better represent the spatial distribution of airborne mineral dust, especially in the upper troposphere (above 400 hPa). Additionally, we analyse the effect of varying assumptions for the size distribution of emitted dust. The results of this study will help to identify the model setup best suited for future studies and to further improve the representation of mineral dust particles in EMAC-MADE3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]