Since the first outbreak in 2013, the influenza A (H7N9) virus has continued emerging and has caused over five epidemic waves. Suspected antigenic changes of the H7N9 virus based on hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay during the fifth outbreak have prompted the update of H7N9 candidate vaccine viruses (CVVs). In this study, we comprehensively compared the serological cross-reactivities induced by the hemagglutinins (HAs) of the earlier CVV A/Anhui/1/2013 (H7/AH13) and the updated A/Guangdong/17SF003/2016 (H7/GD16). We found that although H7/GD16 showed poor HI cross-reactivity to immune sera from mice and rhesus macaques vaccinated with either H7/AH13 or H7/GD16, the cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies between H7/AH13 and H7/GD16 were comparably high. Passive transfer of H7/AH13 immune sera also provided complete protection against the lethal challenge of H7N9/GD16 virus in mice. Analysis of amino acid mutations in the HAs between H7/AH13 and H7/GD16 revealed that L226Q substitution increases the HA binding avidity to sialic acid receptors on red blood cells, leading to decreased HI titers against viruses containing HA Q226 and thus resulting in a biased antigenic evaluation based on HI assay. These results suggest that amino acids located in the receptor-binding site could mislead the evaluation of antigenic variation by solely impacting the receptor-binding avidity to red blood cells without genuine contribution to antigenic drift. Our study highlighted that viral receptor-binding avidity and combination of multiple serological assays should be taken into consideration in evaluating and selecting a candidate vaccine virus of H7N9 and other subtypes of influenza viruses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]