Objectives: To evaluate the impact of aortic root abscess (ARA) on the postoperative outcomes of surgically managed infective endocarditis (IE) and to inform optimal surgical approach. Methods: Between 2009 and 2020, 143 consecutive patients who underwent surgical management for aortic‐valve IE were included in a retrospective cohort study. Multivariable and propensity‐weighted analyses were used to adjust for demographic imbalances between those without (n = 93; NARA) and with an ARA (n = 50). Additionally, empirical subgroup analysis appraised the two most used surgical techniques; patch reconstruction (PR) and aortic root replacement (ARR). Results: Demographic characteristics were similar between ARA and NARA except for logistic EuroSCORE, previous valve surgery, and multivalvular infection. In‐hospital mortality was 8% and 12% in NARA and ARA, respectively (p =.38), with mortality rates consistently nonsignificantly higher in ARA across all time periods. The overall reoperation rate was also higher in ARA (27% vs. 14%; p =.09) and ARA was shown to be associated with late reoperation (odds ratio [OR] = 2.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.18–6.36). Patients treated with an ARR showed a 16% increase in late mortality when compared with PR (40% vs. 24%; p =.27) and a 17% lower reoperation rate (14% vs. 31%; p =.24). Propensity‐weighted analysis identified ARR as a significant protective factor for reoperation (hazard ratio = 0.05; 95% CI = 0.01–0.34). Conclusions: The presence of an ARA in aortic valve endocarditis was not associated with significantly higher early and late mortality but is linked with a higher reoperation rate at our institution. ARR in ARA is protective from reoperation so should be considered best practice in this setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]