소장자료

>>
소장자료
>
000 camKi
001 2210080898242
003 OCoLC
005 20210225115131
006 m d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 191211s2020 mau o 000 0 eng d
019 a1139764468
020 a9780262356596qelectronic book
020 a0262356597qelectronic book
020 z9780262043397
020 z0262043394
035 a2367741b(NT)
035 a(OCoLC)1130311088z(OCoLC)1139764468
037 a11182bMIT Press
037 a9780262356596bMIT Press
040 aMITPRbengerdaepncMITPRdOCLCFdYDXdNdYDXITd221008
050 aQH360.5b.P68 2020
082 a576.8223
100 aPowell, Russell,eauthor.
245 00 aContingency and convergence :btoward a cosmic biology of body and mind /cRussell Powell.
260 aCambridge, Massachusetts :bThe MIT Press,c[2020]
300 a1 online resource.
336 atextbtxt2rdacontent
337 acomputerbc2rdamedia
338 aonline resourcebcr2rdacarrier
490 aVienna series in theoretical biology
520 aCan we can use the patterns and processes of convergent evolution to make inferences about universal laws of life, on Earth and elsewhere In this book, Russell Powell investigates whether we can use the patterns and processes of convergent evolution to make inferences about universal laws of life, on Earth and elsewhere. Weaving together disparate philosophical and empirical threads, Powell offers the first detailed analysis of the interplay between contingency and convergence in macroevolution, as it relates to both complex life in general and cognitively complex life in particular. If the evolution of mind is not a historical accident, the product of convergence rather than contingency, then, Powell asks, is mind likely to be an evolutionarily important feature of any living world Stephen Jay Gould argued for the primacy of contingency in evolution. Gould's "radical contingency thesis" (RCT) has been challenged, but critics have largely failed to engage with its core claims and theoretical commitments. Powell fills this gap. He first examines convergent regularities at both temporal and phylogenetic depths, finding evidence that both vindicates and rebuffs Gould's argument for contingency. Powell follows this partial defense of the RCT with a substantive critique. Among the evolutionary outcomes that might defy the RCT, he argues, cognition is particularly important--not only for human-specific issues of the evolution of intelligence and consciousness but also for the large-scale ecological organization of macroscopic living worlds. Turning his attention to complex cognitive life, Powell considers what patterns of cognitive convergence tell us about the nature of mind, its evolution, and its place in the universe. If complex bodies are common in the universe, might complex minds be common as well.
588 aDescription based on online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on February 24, 2020).
590 aMaster record variable field(s) change: 050
650 aEvolution (Biology)xPhilosophy.
650 aConvergence (Biology)xPhilosophy.
650 aEvolution (Biology)xPhilosophy.2fast0(OCoLC)fst00917312
655 aElectronic books.
776 iPrint version:z0262043394z9780262043397w(OCoLC)1119763590
830 aVienna series in theoretical biology.
856 3EBSCOhostuhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2367741
938 aYBP Library ServicesbYANKn301094165
938 aEBSCOhostbEBSCn2367741
994 a92bN
Contingency and convergence :toward a cosmic biology of body and mind /Russell Powell
종류
전자책
서명
Contingency and convergence :toward a cosmic biology of body and mind /Russell Powell
저자명
발행사항
Cambridge, Massachusetts : The MIT Press [2020]
형태사항
1 online resource
주기사항
Can we can use the patterns and processes of convergent evolution to make inferences about universal laws of life, on Earth and elsewhere In this book, Russell Powell investigates whether we can use the patterns and processes of convergent evolution to make inferences about universal laws of life, on Earth and elsewhere. Weaving together disparate philosophical and empirical threads, Powell offers the first detailed analysis of the interplay between contingency and convergence in macroevolution, as it relates to both complex life in general and cognitively complex life in particular. If the evolution of mind is not a historical accident, the product of convergence rather than contingency, then, Powell asks, is mind likely to be an evolutionarily important feature of any living world Stephen Jay Gould argued for the primacy of contingency in evolution. Gould's "radical contingency thesis" (RCT) has been challenged, but critics have largely failed to engage with its core claims and theoretical commitments. Powell fills this gap. He first examines convergent regularities at both temporal and phylogenetic depths, finding evidence that both vindicates and rebuffs Gould's argument for contingency. Powell follows this partial defense of the RCT with a substantive critique. Among the evolutionary outcomes that might defy the RCT, he argues, cognition is particularly importantnot only for human-specific issues of the evolution of intelligence and consciousness but also for the large-scale ecological organization of macroscopic living worlds. Turning his attention to complex cognitive life, Powell considers what patterns of cognitive convergence tell us about the nature of mind, its evolution, and its place in the universe. If complex bodies are common in the universe, might complex minds be common as well.
관련 URL

소장정보

도서예약
서가부재도서 신고
보존서고신청
캠퍼스대출
우선정리신청
검색지인쇄
등록번호 청구기호 별치기호 소장위치 대출상태 반납예정일 서비스
전자자료는 소장사항이 존재하지 않습니다

책소개

전체 메뉴 보기