Using the method of comparative analysis, the contents of China's Compulsory Education Lesson Plans (2022edition) and Korea's General Education Curriculum (2015 Edition 2022 Revised) are compared in terms of six aspects: Educational Training Objectives, Principles of Education, Curriculum Development, Preparation of Curriculum standards, Preparation of Teaching Materials, Curriculum Implementation and Curriculum Evaluation. Analysis of the differences between the compulsory education curriculum programs in China and Korea. The results of the comparison reveal that there are certain similarities between the current education Lesson Plans and standards in China and Korea based on the legal, cultural and international context of basic education curriculum reform, but due to the differences in curriculum objectives, reform and implementation stages between the two countries, there are significant differences in the actual teaching and learning process in three areas: curriculum development, curriculum implementation and curriculum evaluation. The compulsory Lesson Plans and standards in China and Korea are still undergoing reform and innovation. Korea 's experience with China is as follows:1. breakthroughs in the implementation of the "lifelong education" reform and the "credit bank" policy; 2. active learning in the capacity of primary and secondary schools in terms of overall school curriculum planning, subject development guidance plans and unit planning plans; 3. a breakthrough is needed in the area of creativity in the editing of teaching materials. China's experience with Korea is as follows: 1. the scientific and logical nature of the construction of a core literacy system for student development is worth learning from; 2. the lack of knowledge panels and knowledge skills in some subjects requires a re-examination of the overall structure of the curriculum and the logic of the subject system; 3. the difficulties in improving the quality of education and the polarization of examination results brought about by a highly liberal and democratic curriculum requires a more detailed policies, it is worth pondering.