武形象勳業資料創作及保存考述 以く攀龍臺碑〉及《冊府元龜》所載内容為中心 / The Writing and Circulation of the Biographical Sketch of Wu Shihuo: With an Emphasis on "Panlongtai Bei" and "Cefu Yuangui"
- Resource Type
- research-article
- Authors
- Source
- Journal of Oriental Studies, 2013 Jan 01. 46(2), 95-130.
- Subject
- Language
- Chinese
- ISSN
- 0022331X
李嶠(644-713)所撰的〈攀龍臺碑〉詳述武士鹱(559-635)的一生事蹟 勳業和武氏一族的源流發展,但描述事蹟的真確性一直受到質疑,有學者認為 武則天(624-705; 683-705在位)由於家世寒微,得勢後授意御用文臣李嶠撰寫 〈攀龍臺碑〉,刻意粉飾美化其父武士鹱的形象勳業,藉以自高身價,基於這個 寫作背景,碑文内容每多虛構失實之辭,不宜輕信。也有學者認為碑文之中存 在可資取信徵引的史料。本文的寫作要旨有ニ :藉著可資徵引的史料考述武士 鹱雙親去世大約年代以及武則天與李勣(594-669)族人關係改善;探討宋真宗 (968-1022 ; 997-1022在位)朝黨派鬥爭與劉后(968-1033) 在後宮擴張勢力的 互動關係,以闡釋《冊府元龜》何以收錄早被史家評為虛假而不可取信的武士 鹱資料。大體而言,李嶠受武則天指使,刻意作出粉飾美化陳述,所以屬於史 料創作,而錢惟演(962-1034)等人受劉后指使,刻意在《冊府元龜》置入早被 定性為佞筆的史料,可以歸類為史料保存;兩人所處時代不同,但逢迎心態則 一,而美化粉飾武士鹱形象勳業的描寫,亦因先後出現的獨特時代背景而得以 創造和保存。 The "Panlongtai bei" 攀龍臺碑 written by Li Jiao 李娇 (644-713) details the life and career of Wu Shihuo 武士穫 (559-635) as well as the origin and prosperity of the Wu family. The credibility of these descriptions, however, has been questioned over the centuries. This article attempts to examine the possible periods of the death of Wu Shihuo's parents and a gradual improvement of the relationship between Wu Zetian 武則天 (624-705; r. 683-705) and the family members of 李動 (594-669). It argues that Li Jiao acted on Wu Zetian's instigation to glorify the imperial family by fabricating the biography of Wu Shihuo in "Panlongtai bei". This article also investigates the dynamics of factional struggles in the Song 宋 court, the growing dominance of Empress Liu 案 (968-1033) in the imperial harem, and the ways in which these dynamics led to the incorporation of fictitious biography of Wu Shihuo into Cefu yuangui 冊府元悉.