This study was to compare the similarities and differences of Korea’s Jirisan NationalPark's resources and tourist management with those of China Taishan National Park. Somedifferences were found as the results of this comparative study. First of all, in the legalmanagement, Jirisan National Park was controled under a single law which was 'NaturalPark Law' enacted by the National Assembly of Korea. On the other hand, China TaishanNational Park was controled under 'Scenic Area Management Regulations', which wasenacted by Chinese Central government and 'Taishan Scenic Spot Management Regulation'as well as many other regulations and rules which were enacted by Taishan National ParkManagement Committee. Second, Jirisan National Park entrance fee has been abolishedsince 2006, but Taishan National Park still charge expensive entrance fee which is about20000 Korean won. Third, there were little difference in the number of tourist center andparking lot between China Taishan National Park and Korea Jirisan National Park. However, Taishan National Park has more public toilets and dustbins and less trails signsthan Jirisan National Park. Finally, Taishan National Park and Jirisan National Park provideresources interpretation services as educational management method. However, theinterpreters in Taishan National Park have lower scholastic ability and less professionalknowledge than the interpreters in Jirisan National Park. Moreover, Jirisan National Parkhas thematic interpretation service while Taishan has normal interpretation service.