With the turn of events and promotion of versatile Internet, cell phones are turning out to be increasingly well known. Android is perhaps the most well known groundwork of mobile phones. Realistic UI testing is one significant piece of its quality affirmation. Android telephones use contact screen as the significant I/O technique. GUI testing on android stage will be different to regular programming applications that are intended to run on work area climate. The point of this examination is to evaluate the presentation of two GUI testing draws near (second versus third era) of mechanized UI testing regarding testing Android applications. We have picked UI Automator and Appium to address second period GUI testing approach, Eye Automate and SikuliX to address third time GUI testing approach. Apparatuses utilizing third era GUI testing approach invest in some opportunity to execute experiments than instruments utilizing second era GUI testing approach. It is different between various experiments. Other than bogus positive cautions show up at a lot higher recurrence in apparatuses utilizing third era GUI testing approach than instruments utilizing second era GUI testing approach. Third era GUI testing approach is more effective as far as executing experiments than the second-era GUI testing approach. However, third era GUI testing approach observes significantly more misleading up-sides than second era approach. Accordingly, to keep up with experiments, third era approach consumes loads of human endeavors.