EEG continues to find a multitude of uses in both neuroscience research and medical practice, and independent component analysis (ICA) continues to be an important tool for analyzing EEG. A multitude of ICA algorithms for EEG decomposition exist, and in the past, their relative effectiveness has been studied. AMICA is considered the benchmark against which to compare the performance of other ICA algorithms for EEG decomposition. AMICA exposes many parameters to the user to allow for precise control of the decomposition. However, several of the parameters currently tend to be set according to “rules of thumb” shared in the EEG community. Here, 70-channel AMICA decompositions are run on data from a collection of participants while varying certain key parameters. The running time and quality of decompositions are analyzed based on two metrics, Pairwise Mutual Information (PMI) and Mutual Information Reduction (MIR), and derived recommendations for selecting parameter values are presented.