避风港原则适用的法律后果是互联网服务提供商免于承担法律赔偿责任.互联网服务商不知情是其司法适用的前提;接到有效通知,并采取必要措施以避免损失进一步扩大,是其司法适用的具体条件.然而在实践中,避风港原则司法适用的前提未得到足够重视,适用条件不够具体和明确.因此首先有必要引入红旗原则解读避风港原则司法适用的前提.其次需结合最高院颁发的第 83 号指导案例,通知范围除了证明侵权事实的初步证据外,还应当包括订单编号和侵权行为比对表等;必要措施包括屏蔽、删除、断开链接等,转通知属于必要措施之一.
The legal consequence of the application of the safe harbor doctrine is that the Internet service provider is exempt from legal compensation.The ignorance of Internet service providers is a premise of the application of that doctrine.Receiving effective notices and taking necessary measures to avoid further expansion of losses are specific conditions for the application.However,in practice,the premise of the judicial application of the safe harbor principle has not received sufficient attention,and the conditions for application are not specific and clear.Therefore,it is necessary to introduce the red flag principle to interpret the premise of the judicial application of the safe harbor prin-ciple.Secondly,according to the guidance case No.83 issued by the Supreme People's Court,the scope of the notification should include the order number and the infringement comparison table in addition to prima facie evidence to prove the facts of infringement.Necessary meas-ures include blocking,deleting,disconnecting links,and forwarding notifications etc.