目的 比较和分析比较教学联合基础的教学学习(LBL)的综合教学模式与LBL模式的教学效果.方法 研究对象来自于参加2018至2020年安徽省男科疾病规范化诊治菁英医师班的学员.将学员随机分为比较教学联合LBL教学组和LBL教学组.两组学员在接受所有勃起功能障碍(ED)诊疗规范化培训后,均通过连续短期临床评估方法(Mini-CEX)对教学效果进行评估,同时学员通过问卷形式反馈所接受教学模式的意见.结果 比较教学联合LBL教学组共28名学员,LBL教学组27名学员.除组织能力维度外,比较教学联合LBL教学组在Mini-CEX考核各子维度的得分较LBL教学组显著提高(P<0.05).在教学模式反馈结果方面,比较教学联合LBL教学组优于LBL教学组.比较教学联合LBL教学组可以显著提升知识点的理解与临床实践能力(P<0.05).结论 联合LBL的比较教学在对男科医师的ED诊疗规范化培养中效果优于LBL教学.
Objective To evaluate the teaching effects of comparative teaching combined with lecture-based learning(LBL)teaching mode and LBL mode alone.Methods The physicians who participated in the standardized diagnosis and treatment class of andrology diseases in Anhui Province from 2018 to 2020 were taken as the study subjects.The participators were randomly divided into the combined LBL teaching group and the LBL teaching group.After the training course was completed,the teaching effectiveness of the two groups of the participators was evaluated using the continuous mini clinical evaluation method(Mini-CEX),and questionnaire feedback.Results There were 28 students in the combined LBL teaching group and 27 students in the LBL teaching group.Except for the score of organizational ability dimension,the scores of other dimension parameters in the Mini-CEX assessment in the combined LBL teaching group were all increased significantly compared with those in the LBL teaching group(P<0.05).The results of questionnaire feedback showed that the teaching effectiveness of the combined LBL teaching group was superior to that of the LBL teaching group.The comparative teaching combined with LBL teaching mode significantly improved the understanding of knowledge points and clinical practice ability on andrology disease(P<0.05).Conclusion The comparative teaching combined with LBL teaching mode is better than LBL teaching mode in the standardized training on the diagnosis and treatment of ED.