Theoretical syntheses have the role of describing and guiding knowledge generation, and are usually done by enunciating the conceptual bases that guide research in a given field. In fields that develop axiomatically, the conceptual basis can be easily identified in the set of axioms guiding model building. However, ecology does not develop axiomatically but rather pragmatically, i.e., ecologists do not build models based on a predefined set of assumptions (axioms). They rather resort to any information that seems useful to learn about ecological phenomena. Therefore, a theoretical synthesis in ecology cannot rely on the enunciation of axioms; instead, it requires identifying what information and knowledge ecologists use (i.e., what they decide is useful to learn). Here we present an approach for producing theoretical syntheses based on the information/knowledge most frequently used to learn about the world. The approach consists of (i) defining a phenomenon of interest; (ii) defining a collective of scientists studying the phenomenon; (iii) surveying the scientific studies about the phenomenon published by this collective; (iv) identifying the most relevant publications used in these studies; (v) identifying how the studies refer to the most relevant publications; (vi) synthesizing what is being used by this collective to learn about the phenomenon. We implemented the approach in a case study on the phenomenon of ecological succession, defining the collective as the scientists currently studying succession. We identified three propositions that synthesize the views of the defined collective about succession. The theoretical synthesis revealed that there is no clear division between “classical” and “contemporary” succession models, and that neutral models are being used to explain successional patterns alongside with models based on niche assumptions.By implementing the pragmatic approach in a case study, we show that it can be successfully used to produce syntheses describing the conceptual bases of a field, which have the potential to guide knowledge generation. As such, these syntheses fulfil the roles ascribed to scientific theories in the epistemological literature.