Background: Patients with eosinophilic severe asthma (SA) have an increased risk of asthma exacerbations. Benralizumab is approved for eosinophilic SA, and there is great value in understanding real-world effectiveness.
Objective: The aim of this analysis was to examine the effectiveness of benralizumab in a real-world cohort of subspecialist-treated US patients with eosinophilic SA.
Methods: CHRONICLE is an ongoing, noninterventional study of subspecialist-treated US adults with SA receiving biologics, maintenance systemic corticosteroids, or those persistently uncontrolled by high-dose inhaled corticosteroids with additional controllers. For this analysis, eligible patients enrolled from February 2018 to February 2021, had received ≥ 1 dose of benralizumab, and had study data for ≥ 3 months before and after benralizumab initiation. The primary analysis included patients with prior exacerbations reported and 12 months of outcomes data before and after initiation. Patient outcomes occurring 6-12 months before and after initiation were also evaluated.
Results: A total of 317 patients had ≥ 3 months of follow-up before and after first benralizumab dose. For patients with 12 months (n = 107) and 6-12 months (n = 166) of data, significant reductions were observed in annualized rates of exacerbations (62%; P < 0.001 and 65%; P < 0.001, respectively), with similar reductions in the rates of hospitalizations and emergency department visits. Benralizumab recipients with blood eosinophil counts (BEC) of ≥ 300/ μL and < 300/ μL at baseline and 12 months of data also had significant reductions in exacerbations (68%; P < 0.001, 61%; P < 0.001).
Conclusion: This real-world, noninterventional analysis reinforces the clinical value of benralizumab in the management of patients with eosinophilic SA.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests RA Panettieri Jr.: Advisory boards and grant support — AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Genentech, Regeneron, Novartis. N Lugogo: Received consulting fees — Amgen, AstraZeneca, Avillion, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi, and Teva; honoraria for non-speakers bureau presentations — GlaxoSmithKline and AstraZeneca; travel support — Astra Zeneca; her institution received research support — Amgen, AstraZeneca, Avillion, Evidera, Gossamer Bio, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Regeneron, Sanofi, Novartis and Teva; honorary faculty member — Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute (OPRI) but does not receive compensation for this role. WC Moore: Advisory boards — AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Regeneron. BE Chipps: Advisory boards, consultant, and speaker — AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi Genzyme. B Jepson: Employee — Cytel, on assignment to AstraZeneca. W Zhou: Employee — ClinChoice. CS Ambrose: Employee and shareholder — AstraZeneca. E Genofre: at the time of this study, was an employee and shareholder — AstraZeneca. D Carstens: Employee and shareholder — AstraZeneca.
(Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)