[Evaluation of the training of clinical pharmacy residents in prescription analysis using an ergonomic approach].
- Resource Type
- Academic Journal
- Authors
- Masse M; ULR 7365 - GRITA - groupe de Recherche sur les formes injectables et les technologies associées, université de Lille, CHU de Lille, 59000 Lille, France. Electronic address: morgane.masse@univ-lille.fr.; Douzé L; Inserm, CIC-IT/Evalab 1403 - centre d'investigation clinique, EA 2694, université de Lille, CHU de Lille, 59000 Lille, France.; Perez M; CHU de Lille, institut de pharmacie, 59000 Lille, France.; Cuvelier E; ULR 7365 - GRITA - groupe de Recherche sur les formes injectables et les technologies associées, université de Lille, CHU de Lille, 59000 Lille, France.; Henry H; ULR 7365 - GRITA - groupe de Recherche sur les formes injectables et les technologies associées, université de Lille, CHU de Lille, 59000 Lille, France.; Odou P; ULR 7365 - GRITA - groupe de Recherche sur les formes injectables et les technologies associées, université de Lille, CHU de Lille, 59000 Lille, France.; Pelayo S; Inserm, CIC-IT/Evalab 1403 - centre d'investigation clinique, EA 2694, université de Lille, CHU de Lille, 59000 Lille, France.; Décaudin B; ULR 7365 - GRITA - groupe de Recherche sur les formes injectables et les technologies associées, université de Lille, CHU de Lille, 59000 Lille, France.
- Source
- Publisher: Elsevier Masson Editeur Country of Publication: France NLM ID: 2985176R Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 0003-4509 (Print) Linking ISSN: 00034509 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Ann Pharm Fr Subsets: MEDLINE
- Subject
- Language
- French
- ISSN
- 0003-4509
Objectives: To perform an ergonomic intervention using the methodology of the analysis of the activity of the training process of clinical pharmacy residents in the analysis of prescriptions.
Methods: The evaluation was carried out over two semesters: from May to October 2016 (first study) and from November 2016 to April 2017 (second study). The interviews and observations were conducted by an ergonomist who is an expert in this type of evaluation. The first study was based on observations of the training process and interviews at different time. The second study allowed to support pharmacists and evaluate the changes following the recommendations of the previous study.
Results: A total of 6 and 9 residents participated in the first and second study, respectively. During the first study, 6 difficulties were raised which allowed implementation decisions. Feedback from residents on the training process was generally positive for the first part of the training but negative for the last part. The average number of fears expressed by the residents was higher at the beginning (2.9 fears) than at the end (1 fear).
Conclusions: The training process has been adapted to the expectations and feelings of the residents. Follow-up at the beginning and throughout the internship was essential. The next stage of this work will be to evaluate the contribution of the dashboards for monitoring clinical pharmacy skills in the new degree for hospital pharmacy.
(Copyright © 2021 Académie Nationale de Pharmacie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)