The article discusses the prevalence and evaluation of postoperative pain following root canal treatment. It highlights the increase in clinical trials focusing on postoperative pain as a primary outcome, but questions the relevance of short-term pain studies in determining the efficacy of different irrigation protocols. The article emphasizes the subjective nature of pain and the presence of confounding factors that make it challenging to attribute pain solely to irrigation. It suggests that longer-term follow-up or the control of various variables is necessary for more meaningful results. The article concludes by suggesting the consideration of objective surrogate outcomes, such as inflammatory markers, in future studies. [Extracted from the article]