Agnosticism, Inquiry, and Unanswerable Questions.
- Resource Type
- Article
- Authors
- Archer, Avery
- Source
- Disputatio: International Journal of Philosophy. Nov2019, Vol. 11 Issue 53, p63-88. 26p.
- Subject
- *AGNOSTICISM
*INQUIRY (Theory of knowledge)
*EPISTEMICS
*THESIS statements (Rhetoric)
- Language
- ISSN
- 0873-626X
In her paper "Why Suspend Judging?" Jane Friedman has argued that being agnostic about some question entails that one has an inquiring attitude towards that question. Call this the agnostic-as-inquirer thesis. I argue that the agnostic-as-inquirer thesis is implausible. Specifically, I maintain that the agnostic-as-inquirer thesis requires that we deny the existence of a kind of agent that plausibly exists; namely, one who is both agnostic about Q because they regard their available evidence as insufficient for answering Q and who decides not to inquire into Q because they believe Q to be unanswerable. I claim that it is not only possible for such an agent to exist, but that such an agent is also epistemically permissible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]