Formal analysis of the surgical pathway and development of a new software tool to assist surgeons in the decision making in primary breast surgery
- Resource Type
- Authors
- Nicola Rocco; Francesco Pappalardo; Giuseppe Catanuto; Maurizio B. Nava; Paolo Chiodini; Federico Buggi; Secondo Folli; Venera Ursino; Francesca Catalano; Marco Leotta
- Source
- Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland). 29
- Subject
- Decision support system
medicine.medical_specialty
Endpoint Determination
medicine.medical_treatment
Concordance
Breast surgery
Decision Making
Decision tree
Breast Neoplasms
030230 surgery
Decision Support Techniques
Prevention of defect
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Breast cancer
Postoperative Complications
Breast reconstructive surgery
medicine
Humans
Medical physics
Breast
Set (psychology)
Decision Making, Computer-Assisted
Mastectomy
Surgeons
business.industry
Decision making in breast surgery
Reproducibility of Results
General Medicine
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
Surgery
Oncoplastic Surgery
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Female
Cosmetic outcome
business
Oncoplastic surgery
Software
- Language
- ISSN
- 1532-3080
Background The increased complexity of the decisional process in breast cancer surgery is well documented. With this study we aimed to create a software tool able to assist patients and surgeons in taking proper decisions. Methodology We hypothesized that the endpoints of breast cancer surgery could be addressed combining a set of decisional drivers. We created a decision support system software tool (DSS) and an interactive decision tree. A formal analysis estimated the information gain derived from each feature in the process. We tested the DSS on 52 patients and we analyzed the concordance of decisions obtained by different users and between the DSS suggestions and the actual surgery. We also tested the ability of the system to prevent post breast conservation deformities. Results The information gain revealed that patients preferences are the root of our decision tree. An observed concordance respectively of 0.98 and 0.88 was reported when the DSS was used twice by an expert operator or by a newly trained operator vs. an expert one. The observed concordance between the DSS suggestion and the actual decision was 0.69. A significantly higher incidence of post breast conservation defects was reported among patients who did not follow the DSS decision (Type III of Fitoussi, N = 4; 33.3%, p = 0.004). Conclusion The DSS decisions can be reproduced by operators with different experience. The concordance between suggestions and actual decision is quite low, however the DSS is able to prevent post- breast conservation deformities.